ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Planning Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) disinfection of operating rooms (ORs) is equivalent to scheduling brief OR cases. The study purpose was evaluation of methods for predicting surgical case duration applied to treatment times for ORs and hospital rooms. METHODS: Data used were disinfection times with a 3-tower UV-C disinfection system in N=700 rooms each with ≥100 completed treatments. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation of mean treatment duration among rooms was 19.6% (99% confidence interval [CI] 18.2%-21.0%); pooled mean 18.3 minutes among the 133,927 treatments. The 50th percentile of coefficients of variation among treatments of the same room was 27.3% (CI 26.3%-28.4%), comparable to variabilities in durations of surgical procedures. The ratios of the 90th percentile to mean differed among rooms. Log-normal distributions had poor fits for 33% of rooms. Combining results, we calculated 90% upper prediction limits for treatment times by room using a distribution-free method (e.g., third longest of preceding 29 durations). This approach was suitable because, once UV-C disinfection started, the median difference between the duration estimated by the system and actual time was 1 second. CONCLUSIONS: Times for disinfection should be listed as treatment of a specific room (e.g., "UV-C main OR16"), not generically (e.g., "UV-C"). For estimating disinfection time after single surgical cases, use distribution-free upper prediction limits, because of considerable proportional variabilities in duration.
Subject(s)
Disinfection , Ultraviolet Rays , Humans , Operating Rooms , Patients' RoomsABSTRACT
State-level policy interventions have been critical in managing the spread of the new coronavirus. Here, we study the lag time between policy interventions and change in COVID-19 outcome trajectory in the United States. We develop a stepwise drifts random walk model to account for non-stationarity and strong temporal correlation and subsequently apply a change-point detection algorithm to estimate the number and times of change points in the COVID-19 outcome data. Furthermore, we harmonize data on the estimated change points with non-pharmaceutical interventions adopted by each state of the United States, which provides us insights regarding the lag time between the enactment of a policy and its effect on COVID-19 outcomes. We present the estimated change points for each state and the District of Columbia and find five different emerging trajectory patterns. We also provide insight into the lag time between the enactment of a policy and its effect on COVID-19 outcomes.
ABSTRACT
We analytically derived and confirmed by empirical data the following three relations from the quasi-time-reversal symmetry, Gibrat's law, and the non-Gibrat's property observed in the urban population data of France. The first is the relation between the time variation of the power law and the quasi-time-reversal symmetry in the large-scale range of a system that changes quasi-statically. The second is the relation between the time variation of the log-normal distribution and the quasi-time-reversal symmetry in the mid-scale range. The third is the relation among the parameters of log-normal distribution, non-Gibrat's property, and quasi-time-reversal symmetry.
ABSTRACT
This manuscript brings attention to inaccurate epidemiological concepts that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. In social media and scientific journals, some wrong references were given to a "normal epidemic curve" and also to a "log-normal curve/distribution". For many years, textbooks and courses of reputable institutions and scientific journals have disseminated misleading concepts. For example, calling histogram to plots of epidemic curves or using epidemic data to introduce the concept of a Gaussian distribution, ignoring its temporal indexing. Although an epidemic curve may look like a Gaussian curve and be eventually modelled by a Gauss function, it is not a normal distribution or a log-normal, as some authors claim. A pandemic produces highly-complex data and to tackle it effectively statistical and mathematical modelling need to go beyond the "one-size-fits-all solution". Classical textbooks need to be updated since pandemics happen and epidemiology needs to provide reliable information to policy recommendations and actions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Epidemiologic Research Design , Models, Statistical , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Normal Distribution , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The assessment of the incubation period, which is the period between the infection and the illness onset, is essential to identify the sufficient isolation period for infectious diseases. In South Korea, a few cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were identified after the 14-day self-quarantine program, and the length of this quarantine has raised controversial issues for the Korean public health professionals. We estimated the COVID-19 incubation period using the log-normal distribution from publicly available data. The data were obtained from the press release of the Busan city department of public health and news reports. We collected and analysed information for 47 patients with a median age of 30. We estimated that the median incubation period was three days (95% Confidence Interval, 0.6-8.2). We also did not find any significant difference in the incubation period between males and females. Our findings indicate that a 14-day self-quarantine program should be sufficient to prevent spreading in the infection of suspected individuals with COVID-19 in the community.